REGISTER: Bette’s Easter Speakeasy with Craig Unger on 'Hackers, Bots, Trolls, and, Things'
Bette members: Sunday, April 5, 11 am Pacific, NYT-bestselling author Craig Unger is back with to discuss his brilliant Substack post tallying up all the ways Russia helped install Trump in 2016
***Bette members will find the registration link below the paywall. To join our community events and to help support independent investigative journalism in a time of grave peril, please upgrade to a paid membership.***
After our stunning Speakeasy series over the holidays, New York Times-bestselling author Craig Unger returns Easter Sunday, April 5, 11 am Pacific, to walk us through his brilliant new report documenting the events, step-by-step, leading up to the 2016 election:
I am crossposting Hackers, Bots, Trolls, and Things here — Trigger warning: it’s tough revisiting this, because the stakes were so high and we knew so much:
By the time the 2016 presidential campaign entered its last month, intelligence analysts in the Obama administration had already figured out that Russia was playing a key role in aiding Trump’s campaign. On October 7, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of National Intelligence on Election Security issued a joint statement declaring that:
the intelligence community is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.
The statement notably did not mention the Republican Party or Donald Trump by name, but it didn’t take a genius to figure out who was being hacked. The press release said that leaks “mirror the methods and motivations of past Russian-directed cyberattacks” and were “intended to interfere with the US election process.” Moreover, earlier that summer, on June 14, the Washington Post reported that Russian government hackers had penetrated the Democratic National Committee’s computer network.
As a result, all of America should have known that the Russians had hacked the emails of the Democratic National Committee to aid Trump. Senators John McCain (AR-R) and Ben Cardin (MD-D) both called Russia’s interference in the election “an act of war.” Coming as they did just two days before the second debate between Trump and Hillary Clinton, these were precisely the kind of revelations that ordinarily would have been a devastating blow to the Trump campaign.
But October 7 was a Friday. In the political and media worlds, it is well known that if you want to bury a story, you release it on a Friday afternoon when it is too late for the evening news and will be consigned to the Saturday newspapers, which, famously, are not widely read. Given that Obama was still in the White House, one might think they would have wanted to promote it widely first thing Monday morning as a way of trying to dominate news coverage for the entire week. After all this was an historic even: A hostile foreign power—Russia—had secretly been working on behalf of the Republicans to help Trump’s campaign!
But instead of releasing it when the story might have had huge impact, the DHS and the Office of National Intelligence on Election Security made the announcement at 4:00 pm on Friday.
That meant almost no one would hear the news.
Then, just 30 minutes after the story was released—came another spectacular bombshell. At 4:30 pm, the Washington Post’s David Farenthold released the infamous Access Hollywood video in which Trump boasts about grabbing women “by the pussy.” That meant the Obama administration’s report on collusion—yes, collusion—between Russia and the Trump campaign was pretty much assured of being deeply entombed in the rapid-fire news cycle.
The entire country was agog—and that meant Trump desperately needed to have a miracle up his sleeve. In late July, at a campaign rally in Doral, Florida, Trump had gone so far as to suggest that Russian operatives should hack into the email account of Hillary Clinton, to help retrieve her deleted emails. “Russia, if you’re listening,” he said, “I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.”
In the ensuing weeks, Trump operative Roger Stone had been “predicting” that devastating revelations would be forthcoming from WikiLeaks about the Clinton Foundation. On August 21, Stone had tweeted, “Trust me, it will soon [be] Podesta’s time in the barrel,” a reference to Clinton campaign manager John Podesta. Afterwards, during a Q and A session at a meeting of Republican activists in Florida, Stone had said, “I actually have communicated with [WikiLeaks chief Julian]Assange. I believe the next tranche of his documents pertain to the Clinton Foundation.”
And later, during a radio appearance, Stone had said he expected Assange and WikiLeaks to drop “a payload of new documents on Hillary” fairly soon.
And now, finally, when it was needed most to diffuse the Access Hollywood video, WikiLeaks rode in to Trump’s rescue like the cavalry of yore. Less than an hour after the Access Hollywood tape was leaked, WikiLeaks released thousands of hacked emails of Clinton campaign manager John Podesta, as if they were valiantly fighting to win back control of the narrative. The first tranche of Podesta’s emails contained 2,050 messages that would dominate headlines for the next month. In addition, to make sure the emails were disseminated to millions of social media accounts, at least 2,552 Twitter accounts from Russia’s Internet Research Agency went into action on Trump’s behalf. Former Breitbart chairman Steve Bannon, who had become CEO of the Trump campaign, assiduously aligned the campaign’s messaging with the emails that were being released.
And so it went, Russian hackers and bots leading a supine press corps by its nose. After all, it is far easier to write stories about hacked emails that are delivered on a silver platter than to probe a multifarious political conspiracy to sabotage a presidential election. By late October, the WikiLeaks weapon had been deployed with devastating effect. Every news cycle brought fresh stolen emails. The Trump campaign promoted each release, knowing they came from Russian intelligence.
Then, finally, on October 28, 2016 — just 11 days before the election — FBI Director James Comey sent a letter to Congress announcing that the FBI had discovered emails potentially relevant to its already-closed investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server. The emails had turned up on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner (the estranged husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin) during an unrelated investigation. On November 6, two days before the election, Comey sent a follow-up letter saying the FBI had reviewed the emails and found nothing to change its earlier conclusion.
The damage, however, was done. In fact, Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight analysis argues compellingly that the letter cost Clinton the election — her polling lead was cut roughly in half in the days after it dropped, and she lost several key states by razor-thin margins. Clinton herself said: “I was on the way to winning until the combination of Jim Comey’s letter on October 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me.
The operation that began with Trump’s cultivation in the 1980s was in its endgame. One last week, and an asset of Russian intelligence would be in the White House, in the Oval Office, seated behind the Resolute Desk.
And, as for the DHS memo—who the hell remembers that?—Craig Unger
Craig Unger remembers.
His report reads like a spy-thriller, only, it’s reality, our reality.
Craig was the first person I heard — in all the words of the last decade — https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/WAcY4HtoRMacxXB-C9zNGAsay that what was crippling our nation was that we now lacked a shared narrative of truth.
We try very hard on these pages to bring that back through our community events — together, to cherish truth and humanity.
For those new to Bette, here’s a report I worked on with Craig, revealing key Russian women in Jeffrey Epstein’s orbit — which media seems to finally be grasping:
Keep scrolling to register for our Easter Sunday event.
More about Craig Unger’s work here:
Craig Unger is the New York Times bestselling author of six books on the Republican Party’s assault on democracy, including House of Bush, House of Saud; House of Trump, House of Putin, and now Den of Spies, a real life political thriller about how master spy William Casey put together a treasonous covert operation in 1980 that hijacked American foreign policy and stole the election for Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush.
A graduate of Harvard University, Craig began his career in journalism as an undergraduate editor of The Harvard Crimson. In 1976, he moved to France as co-owner/editor of The Paris Metro, a celebrated biweekly English-language city magazine in the French capital. In the Eighties, as senior editor at New York Magazine, Craig wrote and edited major features on subjects ranging from medicine to pop culture, architecture, and politics. Over the years, his work has appeared in The New Republic, The Washington Post, The Guardian, The New Yorker, The New York Times, Esquire, The Independent, and many other publications. He also served as a contributing editor for Vanity Fair where he covered national security and foreign affairs for more than 15 years.
You can check out his collection of investigative reporting on Trump-Russia and the Republican party’s war on democracy here by ordering his books here:
Read more about the Trump-Russia Timeline and Jeffrey Epstein’s Russian ties on Craig Unger’s substack here:
And please read and share this Q&A from a sweeping interview I did with him in 2025:
Those on a tight budget, please don’t hesitate to reach out to me at bettedangerous/gmail as I offer a discount for fixed income members and those dedicated to activism.
Also, sincere gratitude to those of you who offered additional support in our membership + donation drive. You keep this project going.
Please keep scrolling below the paywall for the registration links.****
****
Bette Dangerous is a reader-funded magazine. Thank you to all monthly, annual, and founding members.
I expose the corruption of billionaire fascists, while relying on memberships for support.
Thank you in advance for considering the following:
Share my reporting with allies
Buying my ebooks
A private link to an annual membership discount for older adults, those on fixed incomes or drawing disability, as well as activists and members of the media is available upon request at bettedangerous/gmail. 🥹
More info about Bette Dangerous - This magazine is written by Heidi Siegmund Cuda, an Emmy-award winning investigative reporter/producer, No. 1 Amazon best-selling author, and veteran music and nightlife columnist. She is the cohost of RADICALIZED Truth Survives, an investigative show about disinformation and is part of the Byline Media team. Thank you for your support of independent investigative journalism.
🤍
Begin each day with a grateful heart.
🤍
REGISTRATION LINK FOUND HERE
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Bette Dangerous to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.