Germany's Google Smackdown
A groundbreaking ruling by a Bavarian court holds Google liable for false AI answers, sending an international warning that the days of inaction for tech crimes may be coming to an end
***Please take out a membership to support the light of truth.***
The promise of utopia never came. The cult of the genius tech bro delivered surveillance and despair, while we make monthly payments for our walled tech prisons.
It wasn’t supposed to be like this. We were promised a connected future, which would be a great equalizer for humanity. And maybe it still could be, in different hands. Elon Musk is openly a Nazi, openly throwing his arm in the air, while throwing elections on behalf of authoritarian cells. And because laws were written for a different era, instead of being on trial at The Hague, he becomes the first trillionaire.
But an interesting thing happened on the way to technofeudalism. Europe is fighting back, which explains why the EU and UK are the target of billionaire owners of social media companies cruelly using their algorithms to spread disinformation about immigration and crime in Europe, with the hope of stirring civil unrest so voters kill their democracies.
Europe, however, continues to punch technofacsists in the face.
Not only is France the first country to arrest a tech CEO, but its recent raid on Twitter’s Paris office reveals they are not playing games.
The reports above reveal the myriad ways Europe is reigning in tech, including countries banning social media for users under the age of 16. This is important because, despite the clever youth who will find away around the ban, it makes a statement that this is something that is bad for you.
Germany’s Google Smackdown
But it’s the latest ruling out of Germany that offers the potential to profoundly thwart tech’s free rein of disinformation terror, waged with no restraint since the beginning of the internet.
Judges in Bavaria just drew a clear distinction between typical search engine results and AI-generated overview summaries.
They ruled that tech giants themselves are responsible for the content of answers provided by AI.
On Friday, a Munich court ruled that Google can be held directly liable for false answers generated by its AI overview, a feature that began appearing recently and led to an apocalyptic decline in news site hits.
According to DW:
“The legal dispute had centered on whether the service should receive the same legal treatment as conventional search results. The court firmly rejected Google’s argument. It ruled that the AI summary does not merely display or link to search results but constitutes distinct content attributable to the search engine operator.”
Google’s defense pointing to case law, which had traditionally protected tech companies from direct liability from third-party content.
But the German court found previous case law did not apply to Google’s new AI tool, “because AI summarizes results in its own words, evaluates their content, and presents them in a structured format, the judges ruled that Google creates entirely new, independent statements that go beyond mere links,” DW reported.
Google attempted to argue that users could verify the sources and that users should know that “AI-generated information should not be trusted blindly.”
The judges also rejected that defense, suggesting that AI overview comprised “a self-contained statement with independently comprehensible content.”
Google is filing an appeal in the Germany court.
The case was sparked by two Munich publishers, which were falsely identified as being tied to scams and fraud without any evidence links. Google’s AI Overview had conflated the publishers with real scam companies, and when the publishers sent Google a cease-and-desist letter, Google was unresponsive.
Another key outcome from the court ruling is the judges determined that AI-generated content does not have free speech protection, declaring that it’s “not the expression of an acquired conviction of the persons expressing it, but the result of an algorithm.”
Germany has strong laws against hate speech, an anti-fascist police force, and its pro-Russian extremist party could be banned.
As I recently reported:
In Germany, the far-right Europe of Sovereign Nations party, the home of the pro-Russian extremists Alternative for Germany, could be outlawed for failing to uphold EU values.
Politico reported that the Brussels-based “watchdog that oversees European political parties triggered a process that could result in the ESN being stripped of its right to be a political party and losing its funding… The watchdog monitors whether political parties and foundations comply with the EU that rules require parties to uphold the Union’s core values — including “respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and human rights, including the rights of minorities” — as enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union.”
In an accompanying 300-page letter, the watchdog spotlights Bulgaria’s Revival, saying it cooperates openly with Putin’s United Russia party, as well as accusing it of being behind violent protests in Sofia and attacks against the European Commission delegation in February 2025.
The letter also highlights a decision by the German intelligence services in May 2025 to classify the AfD party as a right-wing extremist organization.
The days of inaction for hate peddling and disinformation could be coming to an end, as the Google ruling has the pontential of creating a tsunami of action in other lawful countries.
According to a Decoder report on the ruling:
“Even a 91 percent accuracy rate means millions of wrong answers. The Munich ruling goes far beyond this one case. An analysis by AI startup Oumi for the New York Times found that Google’s AI Overviews with the current Gemini 3 model answered correctly 91 percent of the time.
That’s solid enough for everyday use by most people. But at Google’s scale, it still means millions of wrong answers every hour. If enough of that wrong content defames companies or individuals, it could become a serious legal problem not just for Google but for other providers of similar services like ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity. The Oumi analysis also found that 56 percent of the correct Gemini 3 answers couldn’t be backed up by the sources Google linked. The AI is giving answers whose origins users can’t trace.
In this fight for the very survival of democracy moving into the future, we need this kind of thinking, resulting in updated laws for a new era.
This ruling isn’t just about Google — it puts every AI company on notice.
****
****
Bette Dangerous is a reader-funded magazine. Thank you to all monthly, annual, and founding members.
I expose the corruption of billionaire fascists, while relying on memberships for support.
Thank you in advance for considering the following:
Share my reporting with allies
Buying my ebooks
A private link to an annual membership discount for older adults, those on fixed incomes or drawing disability, as well as activists and members of the media is available upon request at bettedangerous/gmail. 🥹
More info about Bette Dangerous - This magazine is written by Heidi Siegmund Cuda, an Emmy-award winning investigative reporter/producer, author, and veteran music and nightlife columnist. She is the cohost of RADICALIZED Truth Survives, an investigative show about disinformation and is part of the Byline Media team. Thank you for your support of independent investigative journalism.
🤍
Begin each day with a grateful heart.
🤍
Love your reporting Heidi!! Thanks so much